Slow day on the forum and I am moderately starved for intellectual consumption.
Narrowing focus and relating with thoughts 'happens'.
thought about the thoughts doesn't necessarily occur - until/unless one steps back from the relating with/experience of them as if they are the be-all and end-all.
thought energy is a 'component of', feeding into interpretation > experience of stimuli noticed > attention and field of awareness narrowed or widened.
Thought doesn't feed into interpretation, it is the interpretation. If you want to call that the interpretation of what's noticed in perception, ok. I don't know anything about a field of awareness because awareness is aware of fields and not limited spatially by ideas, like fields. That's where the mind identification happens, inside the fields of awareness. The truth of the matter is there is no such thing as a field of awareness.
Think of it like viewing a scene through a camera lens. Taking the lens from wide angle to close up to magnified. the interpretations and the experience of those interpretations is 'different' - not saying right or wrong, just different in intensity (wherein 'attachments' & possibly personalising may also heighten), focus & available perspectives.
Think of what like viewing a scene through a camera lens? I don't even know what you're talking about.
In the moment it just illuminates various perspectives/aspects of what is. Whatever is is experienced at the same frequency because we are a part of it.
I would say peeps in awareness hold various frequencies. Someone on a frequency of despair is not on the same frequency of someone in joy, but I don't have a problem with you saying ultimately speaking there is a common frequency between them. I might call that frequency the truth and the energetic implications of avoiding it. It's universal, like 1010 WINS.
Imagination illuminates various perspectives/aspects of what might be... but is not.
I would say consciousness illuminates imagination, but I feel this thread is going nowhere quick.
My earlier post was saying that the sense of inadequacy / not okayness / distress over things that are not arise because they are not the actualised frequency of what is,
Right, they are the actualized frequency of the unconscious mind and its projections. Someone worried about aliens coming to abduct them might be crazy, but they really are in distress.
What is is often times at a different frequency to what might be.
Ok I'm just saying what might be is not and what is, is. If what might be gets here it isn't what might be but what is, now. What might be never is.
When we are in 'what is' we are also an active 'component of' the experience.
How can anyone on Earth not be in what is?