Page 2 of 2

Re: Law of Attraction Paths

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:40 am
by smiileyjen101
On the issue of whether one who is aware of the energies of attraction (and also the ignorance or denial/blocking of it) can still portray human emotions - absolutely they can - I call this the bit where you just wanna pee your pants :oops: but at the same time you do continue to willingly be the hole in the flute through which the 'christ' (creation energy) flows.

I don't find it hard to hear 'if' Jesus was spiritually willing and aware, while also being physically humanly frail and in pain whilst being tortured (what you think it didn't hurt? pfffttt!), while also being loving in nature, and linking into the power of love (energy) in his own forgiveness for others acting in ignorance.

How we die is not nearly as important (or not) as how we live.

Both living and dying in the physical sense are still likely at the very least to make us sometimes cry out in pain, and absolutely at times make us feel like we're just gonna pee our pants. (we are being human after all, in all its gory and glory).

If you're still unsure go check at the local maternity ward ... what ... these women didn't know labour was gonna hurt? (some of them have been there before and go back for more eegads!!)

There is also the consideration of others whose physical 'will' was also in effect... 'thy will, not my will be done', for me doesn't always mean 'God's' (as a separate entity). In any situation there are multiples upon multiples all applying 'force' of energy in motion.

Re: Law of Attraction Paths

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:45 pm
by bf2
You guys are capable of writing and believing some seriously industrial-grade bullshit - I'll give you that.

So many vague and empty words - and so little substance.

Re: Law of Attraction Paths

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:29 am
by Webwanderer
bf2 wrote:You guys are capable of writing and believing some seriously industrial-grade bullshit - I'll give you that.

So many vague and empty words - and so little substance.

Well, that was substantive. Vague criticisms, no specifics what so ever. There was plenty of material worthy of discussion offered to you by our respondents. If you think something said is in error, point it out and detail how it is so. Offer a better, clearer understanding if you can. Right now you sound rather empty. Have an honest discussion rather than pealing out some rant. There are some well rounded and clearly aware thinkers responding to you in this thread. Engage, explore, expand. If you don't understand what's said, ask for more explanation. There's an opportunity here.

WW