Post
by unbornawakened » Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:30 pm
ET does espouse 'belief' in something like the LOA, as evidenced by a few "in passing" comments in some of his talks. Just noticed it recently, and once I remember and find the snippet, will post.
Ken Wilber, and others, talk about the 'absolute' and the 'relative' domains. In the absolute, all is one, and the world does not exist, neither does thought or mind as we know it (the world may appear as a dream, and fades). In the relative, we face the problems and situations particular to human thought and conditions. Since most of us dwell in the relative domain most of the 'time' - in thought, perceptions, emotions, feelings - we need to be aware of its pitfalls. The LOA, to the extent that it is correct, allows us to avoid some common pitfalls. Its application for reaching objects of desire is dubious - it requires urgent and intense spontaneity and alignment with higher purpose (resulting in positive emotional feedback). Again, that works in the relative domain. In the absolute domain, the world does not exist as such and there is nothing to desire or manifest.
What ET is saying is that we can bypass thought and time altogether, by allowing presence to flow - instead of blocking it with our egoic mind. But of course, since we are not present most of the time, we cannot ignore the laws of the relative domain.